Heritage Album - What hurting our American dreams, People or Limbaugh ?

What hurting our American dreams, People or Limbaugh ?

Limbaugh is only one individual, but evil sleeper cells are over 12 million strong in this country. They have criminal genes in their DNA family trees and this is the biggest costs American tax payer have to pay for the peace. These Limbaugh listeners are enemy within, they are protected by constitutions and worse than any Nazi or Taliban. Remember in 1999? people's minds were simply blinded by God, those days, they just have to vote for Bush. And look, what price we are paying today? How's your 401K?

Public Comments

When congress gave corporations personage. The Declaration of Independence, in 1776, freed Americans not only from Britain but also from the tyranny of British corporations, and for a hundred years after the document's signing, Americans remained deeply suspicious of corporate power. They were careful about the way they granted corporate charters, and about the powers granted therein. Early American charters were created literally by the people, for the people as a legal convenience. Corporations were "artificial, invisible, intangible," mere financial tools. They were chartered by individual states, not the federal government, which meant they could be kept under close local scrutiny. They were automatically dissolved if they engaged in activities that violated their charter. Limits were placed on how big and powerful companies could become. Even railroad magnate J. P. Morgan, the consummate capitalist, understood that corporations must never become so big that they "inhibit freedom to the point where efficiency [is] endangered." The two hundred or so corporations operating in the US by the year 1800 were each kept on fairly short leashes. They weren't allowed to participate in the political process. They couldn't buy stock in other corporations. And if one of them acted improperly, the consequences were severe. In 1832, President Andrew Jackson vetoed a motion to extend the charter of the corrupt and tyrannical Second Bank of the United States, and was widely applauded for doing so. That same year the state of Pennsylvania revoked the charters of ten banks for operating contrary to the public interest. Even the enormous industry trusts, formed to protect member corporations from external competitors and provide barriers to entry, eventually proved no match for the state. By the mid-1800s, antitrust legislation was widely in place. In the early history of America, the corporation played an important but subordinate role. The people -- not the corporations -- were in control. So what happened? How did corporations gain power and eventually start exercising more control than the individuals who created them? We, the people, have lost control. Corporations, these legal fictions that we ourselves created two centuries ago, now have more rights, freedoms and powers than we do. And we accept this as the normal state of affairs. We go to corporations on our knees. Please do the right thing, we plead. Please don't cut down any more ancient forests. Please don't pollute any more lakes and rivers (but please don't move your factories and jobs offshore either). Please don't use pornographic images to sell fashion to my kids. Please don't play governments off against each other to get a better deal. We've spent so much time bowed down in deference, we've forgotten how to stand up straight. The unofficial history of America, which continues to be written, is not a story of rugged individualism and heroic personal sacrifice in the pursuit of a dream. It is a story of democracy derailed, of a revolutionary spirit suppressed, and of a once-proud people reduced to servitude.
Yeah, it's a real shame about that pesky Constitution protecting people.
what the hell are you talking about? your american dream is being crushed by your new communist regime.
Well, it's not Limbaugh. When will people realize that he is an entertainer and only a fool would take him seriously when it comes to political issues? WASABI
Limbaugh is! He keeps talking down the current President Obama and how he hopes he fails.
Limbaugh is a United States citizen who gets a paycheck for expressing his opinions courtesy of the first amendment. I am a listener, when I am able and I resent your insinuation that I am some sort of enemy combatant.
in 1999 everything was going so well that I remember thinking that I didn't care who was President as long at the whiners wouls shut up...That was the best I knew at that time. Now so many people in this country have died, been injured or went bankrupt that I know my easy going, laid back life was clueless as to how important it was to vote. I never thought the country could get this messed up we were doing so well I thought things would just get better. I will never again let a republican have any power. The answer to your question is both.
The government, enough said.
Well it sure isn't Limbaugh...as he is American as you can get... I do know it is the One World Government people like George Sorous and Nancy Polosi and the rest of the Democratic Socialist Party... This Mortgage BS all started on Clinton's watch... his behind closed door out of Country secret meetings with One World Bankers...
Barney Frank.
Does President Obama truly believe that he can castigate and condemn Wall Street on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays and then secure its cooperation on the other days of the week? Does he not understand that when he ignites a public furor over AIG bonuses and then incites Congress to pass a punitive tax, he sends shivers down the spines of every other corporate executive who makes a lot of money? Does he seriously believe that Wall Street investors will not worry that their winnings, should they join the Treasury as partners in risky investments, would be subject to public abuse, publicity, and confiscatory taxation? Of course he realizes that his rhetoric makes it unlikely that his program will succeed. He obviously gets it that the entire concept of a public-private partnership is impossible amid a climate of waging class warfare, taxing the rich, and heaping contempt on anyone who makes money. The president is quite bright and certainly understands that you cannot shake hands with your right while you launch a roundhouse with your left. So why does Obama persist in his aggressive rhetoric? Why does he continue to treat Wall Street as something out of Dante's Inferno? Because he's just not that into you! He doesn't really care if the public-private partnerships work out. He sends Geithner out to announce the program because he doesn't want to make it his own. When he announces a stimulus plan or a new spending bill, it's Obama's moment before the teleprompter. But the public-private partnerships he leaves to his Treasury secretary to announce. The most rational explanation for Obama's puzzling conduct — sabotaging his own program by way of his own rhetoric — is that he truly wants to be forced to nationalize the banks in pursuit of his ultimate goal of a socialist economy. Obama has to oppose nationalization today in order to achieve it tomorrow. He has to show the country and the world that he is doing all he can to help the private sector to sort things out with government help. He must ostentatiously invite the hated demons of Wall Street to join him in rescuing the banks in order, later, to say that he did his best to avoid having to take over the banks. Only then will nationalization be an acceptable alternative — when he has run out of other options. Meanwhile, he makes sure the private sector won't play ball by going after their bonuses, sending an implicit message to the other executives on Wall Street that reads, “stay away.” Even when he takes over the banks, as he almost inevitably will, he is going to have to dress up the nationalization as a temporary measure forced on him by the economy and the previously unrealized depth of the problem. He will cite the example of Sweden, where the government nationalized the banks only temporarily and returned them to private hands quickly. You can't be for nationalization. But Obama hopes to accomplish it nonetheless. Already, in the TARP and TALF programs, we can see how eager he is to use government power to manipulate the once-private sector. Consider the mandates piling up on any financial institution that takes government funds: limits on executive pay, corporate travel and conferences; a strong “buy American” recommendation; and aggressive action to get them to make consumer loans. Can affirmative action, low-income lending, and diversity outreach be far behind? If Obama can bring banks and the healthcare industry under government control, we will have de facto socialism. Is this Obama's goal? It is obviously where he is headed.
You may not like what limbaugh has to say but you should defend his right to say it.'Just like I don't like what you say and deeply resent it but I will defend your right to say what ever you would like to say to my death.
Rush is a riot, only the libs take him seriously, the same crowd who takes Barack seriously. Hmmm.......must be some kind of lesson there.
"but evil sleeper cells are over 12 million " Rusty has 500 million trillion evil cells in his body. Have you seen how fat his butt is?!
Limbaugh is a big mouthed jerk. His analogies are pure Republican ****. His intentions are to make people mad. He succeeds, I'm furious with him.
this is so silly all this blah blah blah about Limbaugh...dude, he's been around for over 20 years. He doesn't say anything different than he did back then. You people give him waaaay too much credit.